Looking at the entire Western Conference, there are only three places in the No. 1 position worse than Van Jordan?

Rockets are discussing details of the contract renewal with guard Van Vleet. Some fans think that Van Jordan is short and inefficient in shooting, and an average salary of more than $15 million is a loss. Some fans think that Van Jordan's performance in the playoffs is far better than Jaylen Green, and his annual salary of $30 million is not a problem. No matter which side the fans' opinions are correct, I will give a fact and make a reason here: Looking at the entire Western Conference, there are only three positions in the No. 1 position worse than Van Jordan.

Thunder Alexander, Lakers Doncic, Clippers Harden, and Warriors Curry are all All-Star and League superstar levels this season, and Van Jordan is not as good as that.

Nuggets Murray, Grizzlies Morant, Mavericks Irving, Trail Blazers Simmons, and Spurs Fox are all core or cores of their respective teams. Whether in terms of data or efficiency, they are not comparable to Van Jordan.

Kings Monk and Pelicans Murray, the data seem to be comparable to Van Jordan, and their efficiency is obviously better. Monk's offensive efficiency is better than Van Jordan, and Murray's defense is obviously better. There are already 11 people above

, and the remaining three are not as good as Van Jordan, namely Conley of the Timberwolves, Jones of the Suns and Collier of the Jazz.

After knowing this fact, will the Rockets management still find ways to keep Van Jordan?