The contract is 26 million in one year! He lacks a trading market. Congratulations to the Lakers on the opportunity to get rid of Kleber?

Do the Lakers want to get rid of Kleber?

In my opinion, it is definitely fake if I don't want it. Just say one thing - a three-pointer projection.

Kleber has made a total of 2,249 attempts so far in his NBA career, of which 1,385 are from outside the three-point line. The 61.6% proportion of shots shows that this is the main ending method. However, the three-pointers in the past two quarters showed a significant downward trend of 34.9% to 26.5%.

If a pitcher's perimeter efficiency is very average, there is almost no sense of presence on the offensive end. For example, Russell in the 23-24 season - the three-point rate against the Nuggets Series was only 31.8%. To be honest, it is like a transparent person on the offensive end.

In fact, in the deal between Doncic and Davis, Kleber was "forced" to the Lakers by the Mavericks as a garbage contract.

At the same time, according to the NBA China official website: Due to the lack of a trading market, the Heat are seriously considering laying off Rozier before training camp.

For this news, we can draw two points:

1. It is almost a foregone conclusion that the Heat gave up Rozier;

2. There are not many teams interested in Rozier.

Through these two points, I think the Lakers have a chance to get rid of Kleber.

Contract

As time goes by, Rozier has one year and a contract expires 26 million. It is still difficult to trade when an expiration contract. The important thing is that the amount is large. This is like Westbrook in the 22nd season. No team is willing to take over the contract with an expiration of 47 million at the beginning of the season, but the Jazz took over the annual salary of more than 20 million yuan after the season. The expiration contract of

will not affect the subsequent operations for the Lakers, such as releasing salary space in the summer of 27, recruiting Jokic, Antetokounmpo, etc.

Of course, it is also an expiration contract. The news just now said that the Heat are laying off Rozier. From another perspective, even if the Heat can trade Rozier, they are unwilling to receive a multi-year contract. I mean, cutting will affect the first season of 25-26, but the multi-year contract can affect at least two years of team salary space.

It should be noted that Kleber has a one-year, 10 million contract. Of course, Vincent's expiration contract can also be added for transaction balance. Expired contract, this is one of them.

The trading market reaction is mediocre

As I said just now, although the Heat is actively selling Rozier, there are not many buyers. This has invisibly reduced the psychological price of the heat pipe, which has led to the subsequent desire to lay off.

From a trading perspective, active inquiry and passive inquiry are definitely different.

Pellinka had been negotiating with the Heat before the free agent market opened, but Riley insisted on asking for the first round, which was an active inquiry. In the middle of last season, the Mavericks took the initiative to trade Doncic with the Lakers, so the asking price was relatively small. I think that if Pelinka takes the initiative to inquire about "Dongzi", even if the Mavericks' management does not hang up the phone, it will ask for a price everywhere. The Heat's asking price is relatively low, which is the second.

In summary, the reason why the Lakers have a good opportunity to get rid of Kleber is mainly reflected in two points:

1. The Lakers have an expiring contract;

2. The Heat's relatively low asking price.

For this, I think the second point is the main reason.

First of all, if Riley asks Rozier for a high price, it is still difficult to get what he wants given the limited chips or lack of competitiveness in the Lakers. Just like Wiggins' trade - if the chips given out are competitive, then the 14-year No. 1 pick will have long been wearing a purple gold jersey.

Secondly, whether it is Kleber or Vincent, they are all expiring contracts. To some extent, it can meet the relatively low asking price of the Heat. The same thing is true, since you have considered laying off, you will basically not take over a contract for many years or even two years.

Finally, the opportunity to get rid of Kleber comes, it depends on whether Pelinka can seize it. I think that since it is an expiration contract, it is better to try a transaction. After all, even if the environment is not suitable, it will not affect the team's subsequent operations.